|
|
e
|
 |
On fire! |
Location: currently So Cal
Registered: May 2002
Messages: 1179
|
|
|
I wonder if the parents of any of the children whose foreskins were used to bioengineer this product ever authorized their use. Perhaps there are several circumcised men who should sue. They mey be due royalties on the unauthorized use of their foreskins.
I wonder how many of the women who use this product realize they are rubbing someone's penis on their face,
Think good thoughts,
e
|
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, it's now official. I'm outraged beyond belief at this product. To think that millions of men and boys out there who were maimed at birth by this highly unnecessary, brutal, beastial and barbaric practice (unless it's done for your own religious reasons) are now doubly reduced from having intact genitalia AND being used as raw protien farms for some "anti-wrinkle cream"?!
And here I thought that a foreskin was mostly composed of wrinkles in the first place.
That notwithstanding, doesn't it seem more than just a little odd that we're maiming the boys to make things better for aging women? And they say there's no equality between the sexes. Maybe we get paid more at jobs because we've been short changed at home. Just a theory. I'm kinda angry now and wont reply to comments made about this post so that there wont be arguments started.
But I can't help but feel cheated, first by the doctor who recommended I be whacked off at the end when I couldn't make that choice for myself, and secondly by these greedy companies that now are taking the grissley leftovers of such a "operation" and using it to promote proper skin health. I mean seriously, one act of dismemberment used to engender healthier skin for those that have abused themselves with smoking and not taking care of themselves under the sun? Can I go around cutting off ears because I don't want to listen to rap and country music? Just doesn't make a lot of sense to me, nor does it seem remotely fair.
It's not the wolf you see you should fear, but all the ones he howls with. Don't be afraid of the song, but don't piss off the choir.
|
|
|
|
|
|
what's even worse, is i believe it's been proven products like this don't even work. so not only are boys/men being maimed for the sake of women's beauty products, but also for ones that are pretty much hype and nothing else.
speaking AS a woman .. thing, i mean ... i don't understand, and NEVER have understood these products. eat balanced meals, include fruits in your diet, and drink PLENTY of water every single day. don't smoke. you won't get wrinkly until you're 80. at almost 26 i've been told that i don't look more than 16 or 17. 18 tops. it's quite simple, case closed. all the commercials for these anti-aging products (because i assume when they are in competition, they all have the same ingredients?) use 20 to 30 y/o models to target 50 year old women, it's all a bunch of crap.
i can't help but say though, that it's the male aspect of the media that puts the pressure on women to always be skinny, always look young, always be flawless. women are dumped or cheated on the second that they gain 2 pounds, or aren't flawless in the face and skin. now, i understand you are heated about this topic and i would be too -- in fact, i am, from the second i saw it in my mailbox on the mailing list -- but if (straight) males weren't so preoccupied with going after ONLY the rail-thin, ageless looking women, then women wouldn't give two shits to buy these products.
it's MY hope, though, that these women who DO swear by and use these horrible things, will actually RESEARCH it, or pay attention to articles and information such as this initial link, and WISE UP.
or just stop eating ho-ho's and drinking soda all the time, and take care of their bodies properly, and skip the chopping block of a product. it's no consolation and it means nothing, but at least i can speak for the portion of women who DON'T buy into these kinds of products, and never will--and not JUST because there's other ways to take care of the skin, i emphasised that but only because i don't understand why people don't just take care of themselves .. but also because of where its ingredients are NEEDLESSLY coming from.
people get bent about using shampoos and beauty products that are tested on rats and rabbits and cats and dogs ... this is far worse in my book, because the men the ingredients are pulled from are still ALIVE and missing a vital part of who they are. for all the stress put on non-animal tested products, they damn well ought to start raising better red-flags about this. i myself was NOT aware of this until timmy's mailing. i knew these products were known to use like, placenta/afterbirth for their ingredients, which was already enough to keep me away based off the "ew" factor alone. now, it's just downright terrible.
h:ik
my void does not want.
-- 2.13.61.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I personally have always felt it was un-necassary.
And fortunatly, my mother agreed, so I still have everything there.
But this is maiming... Sure, it's okey for Jewish people,
but if it's not a religous law, then why do it? With enough concern about
hygiene, then there's could be very few problems arising from it.
You said when you'd die that you'd walk with me every day
And I'd start to cry and say please don't talk that way
With the blink of an eye the Lord came and asked you to meet
You went to a better place but He stole you away from me
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
|