A Place of Safety
I expect simple behaviours here. Friendship, and love.
Any advice should be from the perspective of the person asking, not the person giving!
We have had to make new membership moderated to combat the huge number of spammers who register
















You are here: Home > Forum > A Place of Safety > General Talk > That was the definition. This is the morality
That was the definition. This is the morality  [message #22924] Wed, 17 November 2004 16:07 Go to next message
timmy

Has no life at all
Location: UK, in Devon
Registered: February 2003
Messages: 13801



I asked you previously about the definition of incest. Now I am asking about the morality of what ~60% of the prior poll perceived to be incest in a same gender couple. I relaise that some of you find this topic not to your taste. If you want to discuss it please feel free to do so. Simply, please, do not create a battle over it. I would rather learn your view and disagree with you mightily than have your view thrust upon me and feel I am in a fight with you.

Very close relationships, same gender couples

I am looking at a relationship so close that, if it were heterosexual, your legislature and/or religion would class it as incest. Another poll has dealt with the definition of incest: 60% feel the heterosexual definition applies to same gender pairings. Now I am looking at the acceptability. Here is the question: *In a same gender pairing do you, personally, find such a closely related sexual pairing is acceptable?* When you answer please ignore anything to do with age. This is not about ages, just closeness of kin.

I find a relationship this close acceptable in a same gender couple
I find a relationship this close unacceptable in a same gender couple


Current Results



I am also placing the original poll here so you may look at the overall results whcih are now statistically valid, and also place your vote if you have not yet done so:

Does Incest apply to same gender relationships

If we take as the definition of incest that in www.dictionary.com does this definition apply to same gender relationships? In answering please disregard everything except gender.

yes
no


Current Results

[Updated on: Tue, 13 March 2012 14:12] by Moderator




Author of Queer Me! Halfway Between Flying and Crying - the true story of life for a gay boy in the Swinging Sixties in a British all male Public School
Re: That was the definition. This is the morality  [message #22935 is a reply to message #22924] Thu, 18 November 2004 13:15 Go to previous message
timmy

Has no life at all
Location: UK, in Devon
Registered: February 2003
Messages: 13801



The poll here is pretty much self explanatory. It truly is only for those who do find such a close relationship acceptable.

Very close relationships, same gender couples

This question is only for those who find very close familial sexual relationships acceptable. When answering please absolutely disregard age of the participants. The question is: *In a same gender pairing, which of these relationships is acceptable?* Note that I have included first cousins because in heterosexual pairings in some nations that is legally defined as too close. Please tick all boxes that apply, There is no box to say that none of these are acceptable. Please register that answer in a prior poll

parent/child
sibling/sibling
uncle(aunt)/nephew(niece)
cousin/cousin
grandparent/grandchild
great grandparent/great grandchild
adopted relative/family member in this list


Current Results



The reason for these polls is because I have been asked by someone. And I am using site visitors to show him the answers people give.



Author of Queer Me! Halfway Between Flying and Crying - the true story of life for a gay boy in the Swinging Sixties in a British all male Public School
Previous Topic: Art??? or is it???
Next Topic: Admiral's Son
Goto Forum: