I expect simple behaviours here. Friendship, and love. Any advice should be from the perspective of the person asking, not the person giving! We have had to make new membership moderated to combat the huge number of spammers who register
Location: Israel
Registered: October 2004
Messages: 1367
Jon,
Permit me to suggest that you revise your new sig. Since you insist on having it in French, let's get it right.
My guess is that this is what you really want to say:
Tu me permets de te caresser dans l'endroit secret spécial sous tes couilles.
Or maybe you meant to say
Laisse-moi te caresser l'endroit secret spécial sous tes couilles.
("Balles" is as in tennis and what we put into the maw of cannons.)
End of lesson. Time for a break.
J F R
PS. If there are any real francophones lurking on this list please correct anything that requires correction.
[Updated on: Tue, 30 October 2007 15:33]
The paradox has often been noted that the United States, founded in secularism, is now the most religiose country in Christendom, while England, with an established church headed by its constitutional monarch, is among the least. (Richard Dawkins, 2006)
I think Jon was trying to say that he wanted to sniff or smell a boy up in that secret special place under his balls. I was trying to say that I like getting my face the crotch of a hairy boy...
But since four years of North Carolina high school French wasn't up the the Forum's high standards, we decided to go without signature lines. What can you expect when the teacher goes home and listens to Berlitz lessons and then teaches them the next day? They don't even offer French in our school anymore.
Location: Israel
Registered: October 2004
Messages: 1367
Sorry I offended. No offence at all was intended. Rather it was supposed to be humourous. I hope you will forgive me.
J F R
The paradox has often been noted that the United States, founded in secularism, is now the most religiose country in Christendom, while England, with an established church headed by its constitutional monarch, is among the least. (Richard Dawkins, 2006)