I expect simple behaviours here. Friendship, and love. Any advice should be from the perspective of the person asking, not the person giving! We have had to make new membership moderated to combat the huge number of spammers who register
Location: UK, in Devon
Registered: February 2003
Messages: 13800
At some point we migrated to a different web environment. You certainly ought to notice no performance degradation. You may or may not notice a subjective performance enhancement.
We are experimenting with our new server to get the very best performance out of it. If you have any performance impressions they would be interesting, but MAY be limited by your access method or route.
Location: Berkshire, UK
Registered: March 2005
Messages: 3281
All I can say is ... you're well rid of your old provider. They completely lost a VM I had with them on Friday due to a double disk failure (RAID 1), and their backups turned out to be stored on the exact same disks ...
I've been using any even vaguely relevant opportunity to complain about them all weekend.
Regarding the site speed, I haven't noticed any difference; but my own home internet connection's rubbish (even Google can take 10 seconds to load) so any bottleneck won't be at your end.
Location: Berkshire, UK
Registered: March 2005
Messages: 3281
I did make a deliberate decision not to set up a regular backup on that particular system -- it was simply a secondary MX, secondary DNS and diagnostic shell machine, so easily recreated using backed-up configuration files and scripts. Even so, the primary annoyance is the TIME to restore these things to how they were before.
(Some of the systems we see at work, though ... oh my God, how can people sleep at night with no backups at all, frequently not even RAID 1?)
My main email system now has a daily filesystem backup to another disk, a weekly disk image backup (it's a VM for which I run the host) to a third disk, and a weekly off-site filesystem backup ... and I'm still worried that it's not enough.