A Place of Safety
I expect simple behaviours here. Friendship, and love.
Any advice should be from the perspective of the person asking, not the person giving!
We have had to make new membership moderated to combat the huge number of spammers who register
















You are here: Home > Forum > A Place of Safety > General Talk > Norton sucks (and not in the good way)
icon13.gif Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51096] Wed, 25 June 2008 18:08 Go to next message
CallMePaul is currently offline  CallMePaul

Really getting into it
Location: U.S.A.
Registered: April 2007
Messages: 907



I'm finally back on the net after having my computer in the shop for a week. It seems that my anti-virus program, Norton, exploded and took a number of my files with it. My computer tech says it's fairly common and I know the problems Timmy had in the past with them. Anyway, he loaded in a freeware anti-virus program called BitDefender and he swears by it. Now I just need to get a firewall that will handle Vista. Know of any excellent ones that also happen to be free? (I'm not cheap, just broke.):-/



Youth crisis hot-line 866-488-7386, 24 hr (U.S.A.)
There are people who want to help you cope with being you.
Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51097 is a reply to message #51096] Wed, 25 June 2008 18:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
marc is currently offline  marc

Needs to get a life!

Registered: March 2003
Messages: 4729



Hey.... You're right about norton.... It does suck!!!!

Let me know if the freeware you got is any good?????



Life is great for me... Most of the time... But then I meet people online... Very few are real friends... Many say they are but know nothing of what it means... Some say they are, but are so shallow...
Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51098 is a reply to message #51096] Wed, 25 June 2008 18:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John.. is currently offline  John..

Toe is in the water

Registered: March 2008
Messages: 56



Hi paul,

i run vista and have a freeware firewall from pc tools, it works well and i have no problems.

I also run pc toopls spyware doctor with anti virus, works well on my pc and does not cause it to hang.(paid version)Smile
icon7.gif Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51099 is a reply to message #51096] Wed, 25 June 2008 18:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Roger is currently offline  Roger

Really getting into it
Location: USA
Registered: February 2007
Messages: 522



Im sorry guys, I have been running Norton and Norton works for 8 years and I have yet to have a problem with it. As far as freeware, remember, you get what you pay for. Did you talk to Norton? I dont listen to what some shade tree tech says about someones product, I go to the source. Norton absolutely will respond if you make an inquiry. Are you sure it wasnt Vista? Microsoft still provides QEM software for XP and I have a copy. I stripped Vista off my computer and installed XP. Norton runs flawless.



If you stand for Freedom, but you wont stand for war, then you dont stand for anything worth fighting for.
Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51101 is a reply to message #51099] Wed, 25 June 2008 19:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CallMePaul is currently offline  CallMePaul

Really getting into it
Location: U.S.A.
Registered: April 2007
Messages: 907



I ran Norton for years under XP without a problem. But my new computer has Vista on it an I can't afford to switch to XP - although I would love to. And yeah, the problem seems to be in Norton trying to run under Vista. But when the tech stripped Norton off my computer it increased the speed of program loading by 100%. It seems Norton is a pretty big resource hog.



Youth crisis hot-line 866-488-7386, 24 hr (U.S.A.)
There are people who want to help you cope with being you.
Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51102 is a reply to message #51099] Wed, 25 June 2008 20:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deeej is currently offline  Deeej

Needs to get a life!
Location: Berkshire, UK
Registered: March 2005
Messages: 3281



Roger,

If Norton works for you then you should feel very lucky -- you're one of the few people I have come across who hasn't had problems of one sort or another!

At work we used to provide our customers with the slightly more upmarket corporate version of Norton, Symantec Antivirus, and it caused no end of problems -- it's slow, it had various security vulnerabilities (yes, a antivirus product infected by viruses, literally -- they would render it inoperable) -- and it installs itself so thoroughly that uninstalling it has been known to render a machine entirely unbootable (I still shudder to think of the time that happened to me...). We've since moved to ESET NOD32, which is generally pretty good. It's reliable, discreet and uses far fewer resources. (You could have a look at it, Paul, though I don't think it's free.)

My main problem with Norton is that it uses so many resources -- by default it scans absolutely everything before it loads, making a computer much, much slower. You might not notice it if you've always had it, but it's alarming the difference it makes to an otherwise well-tuned computer.

In software terms, Roger, 'you get what you pay for' doesn't really hold true. You get what you pay for in terms of support, yes (by which I mean that you can get a real human on the line, hopefully, if you pay lots of money) but in terms of the software itself -- which can be duplicated effectively for free -- you'll often find a free alternative that does just as much much more efficiently than the expensive market-leader. That includes updates and patches as well -- anything from the level of trivial utilities up to the entire operating system. (This site runs on entirely free software, for instance -- correct me if I'm wrong, Timmy!). Companies will generally pay a great deal for support, so it's often in the interests of software suppliers to give away versions of their products to home/hobbyist for free, to increase market-share.

Personally, I run an online virus-scanner periodically, take a lot of backups, take a great deal of care about what I download and what sites I visit, and I've not had any problems with viruses. I work with a lot of experienced professional sysadmins (several of whom know Windows to a much greater depth than I do) and they would also agree that this is a perfectly acceptable way of maintaining a machine.

David
Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51103 is a reply to message #51096] Wed, 25 June 2008 20:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deeej is currently offline  Deeej

Needs to get a life!
Location: Berkshire, UK
Registered: March 2005
Messages: 3281



Paul -- I've heard good things about AVG Anti-Virus (http://free.grisoft.com/) and also Avast! (http://www.avast.com/eng/avast_4_home.html) though I've never used them personally.

Under Linux I use ClamAV, which works very well as a server-side scanner -- there is a Windows version, though I'd have no idea what it's like. (http://www.clamwin.com/) That one's not just free, but also open source.

If you're happy to go light (and are very careful) then you can probably get away with running an online virus scanner periodically. This ensures that your precious CPU cycles aren't wasted when you don't want them to be. I use Trend Micro HouseCall (http://housecall.trendmicro.com/). I've never used their offline products, though.

David
Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51104 is a reply to message #51096] Wed, 25 June 2008 20:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
paulj is currently offline  paulj

Likes it here
Location: U.K.
Registered: June 2008
Messages: 152



I tend to agree and I have been building computers for five years now or so. For those who cannot afford the steep prices and often resource hungry Nortons of this world I always recommend AVG antivirus and Zonealarm firewall Another usefuseful tool is Spybot S&D it looks for trojans spyware and stuff and is also free also.

ZoneZonealarm free can be found at

http://www.zonealarm.com/store/content/catalog/products/zonealarm_free_firewall.jsp
Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51105 is a reply to message #51096] Wed, 25 June 2008 20:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
timmy

Has no life at all
Location: UK, in Devon
Registered: February 2003
Messages: 13800



Norton so sucks. I use a combination of a hardware firewall in my router and the native M$ firewall. SO far no intrusions.

I also run Spybot search and destroy, Adaware, and Avast! antivirus.



Author of Queer Me! Halfway Between Flying and Crying - the true story of life for a gay boy in the Swinging Sixties in a British all male Public School
Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51106 is a reply to message #51096] Wed, 25 June 2008 21:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
acam is currently offline  acam

On fire!
Location: UK
Registered: July 2007
Messages: 1849



Dear Paul,

I use AVG (Anti-Virus-Grisoft). I think it comes from Czechoslovakia. It's highly thought of and recommended in PCW and by "Ask Jack" in the Guardian.

It's free for private use and downloadable. Google it and read about it.

Love,
Anthony
Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51107 is a reply to message #51104] Wed, 25 June 2008 22:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
acam is currently offline  acam

On fire!
Location: UK
Registered: July 2007
Messages: 1849



Yes, Paul J,

I forgot I also use Spybot occasionally and I used to use Zonealarm before I got a router that changes addresses as a firewall. They are both free too.

Love,
Anthony
Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51112 is a reply to message #51106] Wed, 25 June 2008 22:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NW is currently offline  NW

On fire!
Location: Worcester, England
Registered: January 2005
Messages: 1561



I used AVG version 7 on my elderly laptop until a couple of months ago. Unfortunately, AVG version 8 won't run under Win2K SP3 (and I can't update to SP4 'cos it slows down to the point of un-usability with a lot of stuff that is to "protect" stuff that I don't want to have install in the first place ... like Internet Explorer!)

As a result, I switched to Avast! for anti-virus, and I've seen a considerable decrease in boot-up time and increase in speed and usability. Whoopee!

I use Zonealarm as a free fire firewall, and have never had any kind of problem in the several years I've been using it.

As for Norton ... apparently the current version is less of a pig than previous ones, though a mate of mine has recently had to completely re-install windows XP because of Norton's misbehaviour. It is definitely risky if there's anything at all odd about one's personal hardware or software setup, and when work converts to PC's rather than macs I'll be using Kaspersky (AVG etc are only free to private individuals.)



"The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. ... Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night devoid of stars." Martin Luther King
Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51114 is a reply to message #51096] Thu, 26 June 2008 01:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CallMePaul is currently offline  CallMePaul

Really getting into it
Location: U.S.A.
Registered: April 2007
Messages: 907



Thanks guys, lots of useful information there.

I installed both Adaware and Spybot a long time ago and use them religiously. They are both excellent programs. For a registry cleaner, take a look at CCleaner at http://www.ccleaner.com/download . Some registry cleaners can go overboard and delete important stuff but this one has been dependable for me for a number of years.

I had forgotten all about ZoneAlarm. I had it on my other machine and it worked just fine. Thanks, Paul. I'll download it again. I hope it handles Vista okay.

I'm going to retain the BitDefender anti-virus software my tech put on my machine. I researched it and it's won quit a few awards. It doesn't hog resources yet it downloads updates hourly. If I get flush with money again I'll purchase the pro model of BitDefender. My editor uses Avast and thinks it's better than having sex with a sheep. (You'll have to excuse him, he's a farm boy.) Very Happy



Youth crisis hot-line 866-488-7386, 24 hr (U.S.A.)
There are people who want to help you cope with being you.
icon6.gif Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51117 is a reply to message #51114] Thu, 26 June 2008 13:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
paulj is currently offline  paulj

Likes it here
Location: U.K.
Registered: June 2008
Messages: 152



Hello Paul,

Glad you recall good old ZoneAlarm. I used it for many years till I went entirely router supplied.

I have had a look at BitDefender and I think you are right. The paid for version has some excellent reviews and I guess the free one's simply a scaled down to basics protection?

http://www.itreviews.co.uk/software/s525.htm

for those interested here is some info.

Paul. J.
Re: Norton sucks (and not in the good way)  [message #51136 is a reply to message #51096] Fri, 27 June 2008 17:49 Go to previous message
timmy

Has no life at all
Location: UK, in Devon
Registered: February 2003
Messages: 13800



I was selective with Norton. I kept it on one machine because Norton Ghost was useful. I just used that and some ordinary utilities. I liked the Ghost backup. I've had to use it on more than one occasion.

But I've just bought and tested a pair of terabyte drives from Western Digital that sit and do nothing except automatic backup all the time. if I save a file they back it up! And I can restore.

So I am just completing the full removal of Norton, including using the Norton removal tool. And I also hope my machine will run faster with that crap gone.



Author of Queer Me! Halfway Between Flying and Crying - the true story of life for a gay boy in the Swinging Sixties in a British all male Public School
Previous Topic: Remembering the 50's
Next Topic: So which pill will you be taking
Goto Forum: