A Place of Safety: General Talk » The link says it all

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

The link says it all [message #59685]

Tue, 24 November 2009 13:51

yusime

Likes it here

Location: United States
Registered: April 2008
Messages: 195

http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/supreme-court/family-research-council-we-could-support-gay-scotus-but-not-one-with-pro-gay-ideology/

Just what is the world turning into anyways. Confused

He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake since for him a spinal cord would suffice. Albert Einstein

It does, but it doesn't go far enough [message #59686 is a reply to message #59685]

Tue, 24 November 2009 14:08

timmy

Has no life at all

Location: UK, in Devon
Registered: February 2003
Messages: 13796

So, let me get this right:

Option 1:
“We don’t think that the process of selecting a Supreme Court justice should include asking questions about a person’s personal sex life,” Peter Sprigg, senior fellow at the Family Research Council, told me moments ago.

“But if a person does publicly identify as gay or lesbian, or particularly if a person has been involved with homosexual rights activism at any level, then there would have to be serious questions asked about whether he or she would impose a pro-gay ideology on the court.”

Option 2:
“We don’t think that the process of selecting a Supreme Court justice should include asking questions about a person’s religious life,” Peter Sprigg, senior fellow at the Family Research Council, told me moments ago.

“But if a person does publicly identify as Christian, or particularly if a person has been involved with religious rights activism at any level, then there would have to be serious questions asked about whether he or she would impose a pro-religion ideology on the court.”

Option3:
“We don’t think that the process of selecting a Supreme Court justice should include asking questions about a person’s ethnicity,” Peter Sprigg, senior fellow at the Family Research Council, told me moments ago.

“But if a person does publicly identify as Black, or particularly if a person has been involved with Black Rights rights activism at any level, then there would have to be serious questions asked about whether he or she would impose a pro-Black ideology on the court.”

Any takers to write options 4 thru 99?

[Updated on: Tue, 24 November 2009 14:09]

Author of Queer Me! Halfway Between Flying and Crying - the true story of life for a gay boy in the Swinging Sixties in a British all male Public School

Re: The link says it all [message #59689 is a reply to message #59685]

Tue, 24 November 2009 16:25

timmy

Has no life at all

Location: UK, in Devon
Registered: February 2003
Messages: 13796

You know, I don't think this leopard will change its spots, not at all.

http://timtrent.blogspot.com/2009/11/is-this-good-or-bad.html may interest you.

Author of Queer Me! Halfway Between Flying and Crying - the true story of life for a gay boy in the Swinging Sixties in a British all male Public School

Previous Topic:	EU takes a stand against anti-gay religious exemptions
Next Topic:	Southern Voice Closes

Goto Forum:

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

We support Ukraine — Мы поддерживаем Украину — Ми підтримуємо Україну

We support Palestine — We support Palestine — We support Palestine