|
|
|
timmy
|
 |
Has no life at all |
Location: UK, in Devon
Registered: February 2003
Messages: 13818
|
|
|
It is all part of the "Why am I gay?" thing.
When we are children, apart from the fact that little boys have liuttle willies, and little girls have an an=bsence of willy, our bodies, male and female, are remarkably similar. This is expecially true when the child is physically fit and in good muscle condition.
When viewed from behind, the body form of a juvenile (I am using the biological definition not the legal definition) male is indistinguishable from a juvenile female.
Oh, a disclaimer here. Anyone with a dirty mind who thinks I am about to write a thing about sex with children can think again. I am not.
In general we grow up seeing very few naked people. But, as juveniles, nakedness seems to be fairly normally accepted. So little boys see little girls and vice versa.
The reason for my musing is to try to work out why, to me and to almost all gay me, the female adult form is unattractive. Please do not try to twist this into finding a juvenile form attractive.
As puberty kicks in the shape changes are most obvious on a girl's body. The hips widen, the butt changes shape, emphasising a narrow waist. I am still looking from behind, which means that the genitalia are hidden.
And here is the odd puzzle. 90% of males start to find the curves on the females are attractive. 10% of us can't work out what all the fuss is about.
I'm not sure where I'm going with this. I'm just wondering, I think, why the timmy who enterend puberty with an apparently equal chance with all the rest to be str8 left it gay. Yet, surely I should have found girls become attractibve as they matured in front of my eyes? Surely?
Author of Queer Me! Halfway Between Flying and Crying - the true story of life for a gay boy in the Swinging Sixties in a British all male Public School
|
|
|
|
|
[  ] |
A Place of Safety
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
This puzzles me a little 
