A Place of Safety
I expect simple behaviours here. Friendship, and love.
Any advice should be from the perspective of the person asking, not the person giving!
We have had to make new membership moderated to combat the huge number of spammers who register
















You are here: Home > Forum > A Place of Safety > General Talk > Timmy, please do not do this to me.
Timmy, please do not do this to me.  [message #28228] Thu, 16 February 2006 02:00 Go to previous message
cossie is currently offline  cossie

On fire!
Location: Exiled in North East Engl...
Registered: July 2003
Messages: 1699



You have closed down Marc's thread about sexual undertones, later redefined by others as inappropriate behaviour.

I have spent a thoroughly miserable day worrying about this issue. You say in your final post -

"Like I said, it is time to be silent on this. We must have a victim, must we? Someone to poke and prod. It;s great to pillory a perosn and make them suffer, so let's do that.

Or better, let's not.

The question was rehtorical. The thread is closed."

But the terms in which the original post was couched very clearly implied that there had been 'sexual undertones' when 'a youth makes an entrance to the board'. It is abundantly clear that in the relatively recent past Brian is the only 'youth' to have 'made an entrance'; it is equally clear that (apart from a couple of innocuous remarks from one other poster) I am the only one who has logged posts directed to Brian which include anything which could be conceivably be described as 'sexual undertones' - though in my view they were clearly humorous to the extent that 'overtones' would be a more accurate description.

Anyone checking out posts over the last couple of months could not do other than conclude that I was the person who had posted 'sexual undertones' and, by association with what came later, that I am the one guilty of inappropriate behaviour.

You say 'We must have a victim, must we? Someone to poke and prod?' Well,
so long as the subject is brushed under the carpet, you DO have a victim, and I am he. If I am left under this cloud of innuendo then I cannot possibly continue as a member of this community - and I do not want to leave, because I have hugely enjoyed the interaction between this group of people I am proud to call friends.

Your penultimate post referred to 'something improper'. If the implication of impropriety had not been raised, then we could all get on with our lives - but once you DO raise the matter, the moving finger moves on. You can't unsay what was said, and the muck sticks, as they say in this part of the world.

Please, Timmy: whether intentionally or otherwise, you have left me covered in muck. To remove it, I need to be directly challenged by an accusation of wrongdoing, so that I can attempt to refute it, or I need to be specifically and unequivocally exonerated - and in view of what has gone before I cannot see how this can be done without being equally specific in identifying what you regard as improper behaviour. Who? is not a question which interests me, as long as it isn't me.



For a' that an' a' that,
It's comin' yet for a' that,
That man tae man, the worrld o'er
Shall brithers be, for a' that.
 
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message icon4.gif
Read Message icon4.gif
Previous Topic: irvin
Next Topic: Deej's point about apologies
Goto Forum:
  

[ RSS ]