A Place of Safety
I expect simple behaviours here. Friendship, and love.
Any advice should be from the perspective of the person asking, not the person giving!
We have had to make new membership moderated to combat the huge number of spammers who register
















You are here: Home > Forum > A Place of Safety > General Talk > Rules of War
Rules of War  [message #32379] Tue, 30 May 2006 12:34 Go to previous message
JFR is currently offline  JFR

On fire!
Location: Israel
Registered: October 2004
Messages: 1367



In another thread David wrote:

I would remind you that this is hardly an ordinary war -- terrorists spring from the ranks of peaceful civilians, then vanish again... Quite frankly, I don't think there's any way you can eliminate terrorism altogether, so a "war against terrorism" is hopeless from the outset. (That does not mean we should not be fighting it.) Look at the IRA.

David, I must have misunderstood you because I find in your words what appear to be mutually contradictory thoughts. On the one hand you say that a war against terrorism (as in the Middle Eastern conflicts) is hopeless from the outset and yet you complement that with the thought that we should nevertheless be fighting that war.

If a war is hopeless should we just sit back and let terror destroy our way of life? And if we choose to fight a war - terrible as that certainly is - should we not believe and hope in the possibility of victory?

I think that your reference to the IRA is gratuitous. The IRA had (has?) a purely political motive for its actions: the unification of Ireland (against the wishes of the majority of the citizens of the province of Ulster). Moslem terror is not politically motivated: it is religiously and racially motivated. For them, Western society is the society of the infidels and Moslem terrorists are Saracens reborn.

Clarifications, please - in your usual crystal clear prose Smile.



The paradox has often been noted that the United States, founded in secularism, is now the most religiose country in Christendom, while England, with an established church headed by its constitutional monarch, is among the least. (Richard Dawkins, 2006)
 
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Read Message  
Previous Topic: Dealing with Cyberbullies - from the US CERT Service
Next Topic: Lets all blame the US
Goto Forum:
  

[ RSS ]