|
|
|
timmy
|

 |
Has no life at all |
Location: UK, in Devon
Registered: February 2003
Messages: 13818
|
|
|
"Beautiful" and "sexy" raised a thought. Look at
.
He is not, as I have said, beautiful, though he is also not ugly. And only in life can you see, or could you see when I knew him, what made him so mouth wateringly sexy and hot.
But what is it, really, that defines the differences and similarities between Beauty and Sexiness?
Take two actresses/TV people:

Ulrika Jonsson. A beautiful Scandewegain blonde whose features are regualr,
and who has beauty but not sexiness.

Sandra Bullock who is by no means ugly,
but whose face is not a classic beauty,
but who is most assuredly sexy.
What is it that makes one sexy and the other not, even in a picture?
Author of Queer Me! Halfway Between Flying and Crying - the true story of life for a gay boy in the Swinging Sixties in a British all male Public School
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Beauty vs Sexiness/cuteness
By: timmy on Mon, 17 July 2006 11:44
|
 |
|
Re: Beauty vs Sexiness/cuteness
|
 |
|
Re: Beauty vs Sexiness/cuteness
By: Deeej on Mon, 17 July 2006 12:32
|
 |
|
Well...
By: Deeej on Mon, 17 July 2006 12:30
|
 |
|
Re: Well...
|
 |
|
Re: Well...
|
 |
|
Re: Well...
By: Deeej on Mon, 17 July 2006 13:19
|
 |
|
Dame Judi is a national icon
By: Deeej on Mon, 17 July 2006 13:18
|
 |
|
Re: Beauty vs Sexiness/cuteness
By: marc on Mon, 17 July 2006 13:17
|
 |
|
Re: Beauty vs Sexiness/cuteness
By: timmy on Tue, 18 July 2006 06:20
|
 |
|
I don't really know, but ...
By: cossie on Tue, 18 July 2006 04:56
|
 |
|
I'm technologically undereducated!
By: cossie on Tue, 18 July 2006 05:03
|
 |
|
Re: I'm technologically undereducated!
By: timmy on Tue, 18 July 2006 06:21
|
 |
|
I didn't mean anything too profound ...
By: cossie on Wed, 19 July 2006 23:18
|
 |
|
Re: I didn't mean anything too profound ...
By: timmy on Thu, 20 July 2006 07:17
|
 |
|
Re: I didn't mean anything too profound ...
By: Nigel on Thu, 20 July 2006 07:34
|
Goto Forum:
[  ]
|