|
|
|
timmy
|

 |
Has no life at all |
Location: UK, in Devon
Registered: February 2003
Messages: 13818
|
|
|
Interesting report from Lexis Nobile, a journal of words and letters, regretably not online:
All the neologisms nowadays are making dictionaries longer and longer. We seem unable to turn around before someone has added new words, new phrases, to the ever increasing wordlists. Now the Shorter Oxford Dictionary (actually a weighty tome in its own right) is planning a reshuffle.
The full edition, which we'd really prefer to know as "The whole shebang", will continue to contain and track the English language to the fullest possible extent, based on verifiable words. But "shebang" is a neologsim that will not make the cut for the Shorter dictionary, despite being acknowledged in the language for many years.
Alongside the project they are removing words no longer in common parlance. This includes such terms as stouthrief, and hamesucken, both crimes in Scotland, but wholly non notable anywhere else, one meaning entering a home forcibly with a view to theft, and the other meaning the same, plus beating the crap out of the householder. Other words not to make the cut alongside shebang include "gullible", "palimpsest", and brand names such as "rotovator". The "Corn Flake" remains, despite being a brand name.
Critics have said that this is a precursor to the rationalisation of spelling, potentially on the US model, where apparently redundnat letters are stripped away. They fear that "modelling" will become "modeling", and that "leverage" will also be redefined as a verb instead of a noun.
Never say this forum is not educational.
Author of Queer Me! Halfway Between Flying and Crying - the true story of life for a gay boy in the Swinging Sixties in a British all male Public School
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Purges on Dictionaries
By: timmy on Fri, 22 September 2006 07:44
|
 |
|
Re: Purges on Dictionaries
By: arich on Fri, 22 September 2006 11:21
|
 |
|
'Twas ever thus!
By: cossie on Sat, 23 September 2006 03:20
|
 |
|
Re: 'Twas ever thus!
By: E.J. on Sat, 23 September 2006 04:14
|
 |
|
Re: 'Twas ever thus!
By: Deeej on Sat, 23 September 2006 11:22
|
 |
|
Re: 'Twas ever thus!
By: Nigel on Sat, 23 September 2006 14:25
|
 |
|
Re: 'Twas ever thus!
By: Deeej on Sat, 23 September 2006 14:51
|
 |
|
You want more .... you can have more .... !!
By: cossie on Sun, 24 September 2006 02:41
|
 |
|
Re: 'Twas ever thus!
By: Blumoogle on Sun, 24 September 2006 16:42
|
 |
|
Dewald…
By: Nigel on Sun, 24 September 2006 19:50
|
 |
|
You are so right, Dee!
By: cossie on Mon, 25 September 2006 03:41
|
 |
|
Re: 'Twas ever thus!
By: E.J. on Sat, 23 September 2006 04:52
|
 |
|
Re: 'Twas ever thus!
|
 |
|
Re: 'Twas ever thus!
By: timmy on Sat, 23 September 2006 21:02
|
 |
|
The main reason being ....
By: cossie on Sun, 24 September 2006 03:27
|
 |
|
Re: The main reason being ....
By: Aussie on Sun, 24 September 2006 07:44
|
 |
|
Re: The main reason being ....
By: timmy on Sun, 24 September 2006 13:02
|
 |
|
Re: The main reason being ....
By: marc on Sun, 24 September 2006 15:12
|
 |
|
Re: The main reason being ....
By: timmy on Sun, 24 September 2006 16:18
|
 |
|
Re: The main reason being ....
By: marc on Sun, 24 September 2006 17:30
|
 |
|
Re: The main reason being ....
By: timmy on Mon, 25 September 2006 06:32
|
 |
|
Re: The main reason being ....
|
 |
|
Re: The main reason being ....
By: Deeej on Sun, 24 September 2006 16:30
|
 |
|
Re: The main reason being ....
By: Aussie on Mon, 25 September 2006 01:29
|
 |
|
Re: The main reason being ....
By: timmy on Mon, 25 September 2006 06:29
|
 |
|
Strya? ....
By: cossie on Tue, 26 September 2006 02:29
|
 |
|
Re: Strya? ....
By: Aussie on Tue, 26 September 2006 02:48
|
 |
|
Re: Strya? ....
By: Deeej on Tue, 26 September 2006 08:43
|
 |
|
Re: The main reason being ....
By: kupuna on Sun, 24 September 2006 22:27
|
Goto Forum:
[  ]
|