|
|
|
timmy
|

 |
Has no life at all |
Location: UK, in Devon
Registered: February 2003
Messages: 13828
|
|
|
All in all, sex is a ridiculous act. Penetrating one set of body parts with another set of body parts and rubbing a bit, well, that is plain ludicrous.
I got to thinking about body parts, form and function.
Although long term gay men are likely to say "yuck" when faced with a vagina, bear with me. A vagina is simply a moist environment which welcomes a penis, and is reasonably easy to penetrate.
A penis is simply a tube of flesh with a surprisingly insenstive tip (it can handle hot, cold, pain, and touch only. Other fatcors are required for orgasm or all men would have them all the time just from walking about).
Looked at dispassionately, neither a penis nor a vagina is particularly aesthetically pleasing. Funtional, yes, but not really something that would enhance one's living room if models of them were to be on display.
I moved my thoughts away from sex to the other person.
Each of us is different, but I suspect most people care what it is that gives them an orgasm. Men do not, I think, put a penis into the hands of someone who will abuse it. Most men, anyway. And, if we were indiscriminate we would not care if our sexual partner of the moment were male, female or a farmyard animal. And this is true even if we cannot see our partner. Think glory holes. Well I prefer not to, but, in general, these are a masculine adventure. I'm sure there are such holes for ladies on one side and gentlemen on the other, of course there are, but they seem not to form part of "sexual mythology"
So what do we want from sex? Why is sex so "special"?
Author of Queer Me! Halfway Between Flying and Crying - the true story of life for a gay boy in the Swinging Sixties in a British all male Public School
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
I have been thinking about sex
By: timmy on Thu, 30 November 2006 18:33
|
 |
|
Re: I have been thinking about sex
By: jacmar on Thu, 30 November 2006 18:52
|
 |
|
Re: I have been thinking about sex
By: ZeroGrav on Thu, 30 November 2006 18:57
|
 |
|
Ah, but IS it body parts?
By: timmy on Thu, 30 November 2006 19:01
|
 |
|
Re: Ah, but IS it body parts?
By: jacmar on Thu, 30 November 2006 19:14
|
 |
|
Which gives us the basic question
By: timmy on Thu, 30 November 2006 19:21
|
 |
|
Re: Which gives us the basic question
By: jacmar on Thu, 30 November 2006 19:45
|
 |
|
Re: Which gives us the basic question
By: timmy on Thu, 30 November 2006 21:02
|
 |
|
Re: Which gives us the basic question
By: ZeroGrav on Thu, 30 November 2006 21:22
|
 |
|
Re: Which gives us the basic question
By: timmy on Thu, 30 November 2006 21:33
|
 |
|
Re: Ah, but IS it body parts?
By: ZeroGrav on Thu, 30 November 2006 19:14
|
 |
|
Re: I have been thinking about sex
By: NW on Thu, 30 November 2006 19:28
|
 |
|
Re: I have been thinking about sex
By: tBP on Thu, 30 November 2006 21:34
|
 |
|
Re: I have been thinking about sex
By: timmy on Thu, 30 November 2006 21:41
|
 |
|
Re: I have been thinking about sex
By: NW on Thu, 30 November 2006 21:56
|
 |
|
Indefinable????????
By: marc on Thu, 30 November 2006 22:00
|
 |
|
marc
By: ZeroGrav on Thu, 30 November 2006 22:21
|
 |
|
Re: marc
By: jacmar on Fri, 01 December 2006 00:36
|
 |
|
Re: marc
By: timmy on Fri, 01 December 2006 07:56
|
 |
|
Re: Indefinable????????
By: kupuna on Fri, 01 December 2006 00:51
|
 |
|
Re: I have been thinking about sex
By: Nigel on Thu, 30 November 2006 22:08
|
 |
|
Re: I have been thinking about sex
By: Nigel on Fri, 01 December 2006 09:18
|
 |
|
&c.
By: Deeej on Thu, 30 November 2006 23:57
|
 |
|
Re: &c.
By: timmy on Fri, 01 December 2006 08:15
|
 |
|
Re: &c.
By: arich on Sat, 02 December 2006 04:49
|
 |
|
Re: &c.
By: arich on Sat, 02 December 2006 04:55
|
 |
|
Re: &c.
By: timmy on Sat, 02 December 2006 07:45
|
 |
|
Re: I have been thinking about sex
By: timmy on Fri, 01 December 2006 17:20
|
 |
|
Re: I have been thinking about sex
By: Josh on Sat, 02 December 2006 02:16
|
 |
|
Hmm
By: Deeej on Sat, 02 December 2006 03:12
|
 |
|
Re: Hmm
By: timmy on Sat, 02 December 2006 07:30
|
 |
|
Re: Deeej's Hmm
By: Nigel on Sat, 02 December 2006 09:18
|
 |
|
Re: Hmm
By: Josh on Sat, 02 December 2006 15:24
|
 |
|
Re: Hmm
By: NW on Sat, 02 December 2006 15:44
|
 |
|
Re: Hmm
By: Josh on Sat, 02 December 2006 16:21
|
 |
|
Re: Hmm
By: Deeej on Sat, 02 December 2006 16:44
|
 |
|
OK, to reduce the thing to its basics ...
By: cossie on Sat, 02 December 2006 04:38
|
 |
|
Re: OK, to reduce the thing to its basics ...
By: timmy on Sat, 02 December 2006 07:41
|
 |
|
Re: OK, to reduce the thing to its basics ...
By: arich on Sat, 02 December 2006 11:52
|
 |
|
Aspergers, etc.
By: Deeej on Sat, 02 December 2006 12:10
|
 |
|
More about the basics!
By: cossie on Sun, 03 December 2006 02:56
|
 |
|
Re: More about the basics!
By: NW on Sun, 03 December 2006 07:53
|
 |
|
Maybe so ...
By: cossie on Sun, 03 December 2006 08:44
|
Goto Forum:
[  ]
|