|
|
|
|
It's been implied several times over the past couple of years that I'm the kind of person who can't see the wood for the trees.
It seems to me to be asserting that I can't see humanity for the humans. And this is exactly right: I am deeply suspicious of those who deal in large-scale woolly concepts like "the good of humanity" - it is usually followed by phrases about "can't make omelettes without breaking eggs", "greatest good of greatest number" and suchlike.
What I, as an individual human, fear most is anyone who asserts that the collective rights of some mythical "humanity" outweigh the individual rights of individual human beings. There is no "humanity", there are only humans. Seeing the benefits to "humanity", rather than dealing in individual humans, leads to the obscenities of forcible sterilisation of the unfit, the poor, and members of specific ethnic groups as "eugenics". It leads to unthinking assertions about the alleged supremacy of law, without concern for the reasons for or effects of particular laws. It leads - because the ability of those who have power and privilege to delude themselves that they act from praiseworthy motives - to colonialism, invasion, economic servitude and slavery.
Let us celebrate individual trees! Let us rejoice in their diversity! Let us relish both the sapling, and those decaying fallen trunks that provide such interesting habitats.
But please, let us not say ... whatever happens to ten, or twenty, or thirty or howevermany percent of the trees, the wood is the important thing. . Each tree has value, and without trees there is no wood.
"The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. ... Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night devoid of stars." Martin Luther King
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Standing up for the trees ...
By: NW on Mon, 07 May 2007 22:13
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: timmy on Mon, 07 May 2007 22:28
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: NW on Mon, 07 May 2007 22:33
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: kupuna on Tue, 08 May 2007 20:05
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: marc on Mon, 07 May 2007 22:45
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: NW on Mon, 07 May 2007 23:04
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: marc on Mon, 07 May 2007 23:12
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: JimB on Tue, 08 May 2007 03:40
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: Nigel on Tue, 08 May 2007 09:25
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: tBP on Wed, 09 May 2007 00:03
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: NW on Wed, 09 May 2007 00:51
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: tBP on Wed, 09 May 2007 11:29
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: NW on Wed, 09 May 2007 12:46
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: tBP on Wed, 09 May 2007 14:13
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
By: NW on Wed, 09 May 2007 14:24
|
 |
|
A view from a different angle
By: JFR on Wed, 09 May 2007 14:40
|
 |
|
Re: A view from a different angle
By: tBP on Thu, 10 May 2007 10:39
|
 |
|
Re: Standing up for the trees ...
|
 |
|
Thoughts on the problems of arboriculture.
By: cossie on Fri, 11 May 2007 04:26
|
 |
|
Re: Thoughts on the problems of arboriculture.
By: NW on Fri, 11 May 2007 12:06
|
 |
|
Since John Stuart Mill has been mentioned...
By: JFR on Fri, 11 May 2007 13:19
|
 |
|
Re: Since John Stuart Mill has been mentioned...
By: NW on Fri, 11 May 2007 14:16
|
 |
|
Re: Thoughts on the problems of arboriculture.
By: kupuna on Fri, 11 May 2007 13:33
|
 |
|
I'm a lumberjack and I'm all right!
By: cossie on Sat, 12 May 2007 02:56
|
 |
|
Re: I'm a lumberjack and I'm all right!
By: NW on Sat, 12 May 2007 11:55
|
 |
|
Sorry for the delay - I've been sharpening my axe
By: cossie on Sun, 13 May 2007 03:07
|
 |
|
Re: Sorry for the delay - I've been sharpening my axe
By: NW on Sun, 13 May 2007 09:36
|
 |
|
Well, as regards the pedantry ...
By: cossie on Mon, 14 May 2007 04:08
|
Goto Forum:
[  ]
|