|
|
|
timmy
|

 |
Has no life at all |
Location: UK, in Devon
Registered: February 2003
Messages: 13818
|
|
|
When I first found porn online the digicam era was not here. The pictures looked very staged, as if the subjects had to hold artistic poses while the cameraman clicked. Film is expensive, after all!
Today the digicam means that they can move freely and the camera catches all, and 99.9% of the images can be discarded.
Is this really so, or is it just that fashion has changed?
Author of Queer Me! Halfway Between Flying and Crying - the true story of life for a gay boy in the Swinging Sixties in a British all male Public School
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
With digital cameras has porn become less posed?
By: timmy on Sun, 14 February 2010 09:14
|
 |
 |
Re: With digital cameras... 2 Qualified Responses for Tim:
|
 |
|
Other observations
By: timmy on Sun, 14 February 2010 15:05
|
 |
|
Re: With digital cameras... 2 Qualified Responses for Tim:
By: M on Mon, 15 February 2010 05:00
|
 |
|
And another thing
By: timmy on Mon, 15 February 2010 23:06
|
 |
|
Re: With digital cameras has porn become less posed?
By: Macky on Tue, 16 February 2010 00:37
|
 |
|
Re: With digital cameras has porn become less posed?
By: timmy on Sun, 11 July 2010 17:28
|
 |
|
Re: With digital cameras has porn become less posed?
By: JimB on Mon, 12 July 2010 16:18
|
 |
|
Re: With digital cameras has porn become less posed?
By: timmy on Mon, 12 July 2010 17:14
|
 |
 |
Ah the poses of the 80s and 90s
By: timmy on Tue, 17 January 2012 19:24
|
 |
 |
What observations do you have?
By: timmy on Tue, 17 January 2012 22:31
|
 |
|
Not intending to quibble ...
|
 |
|
Re: Not intending to quibble ...
By: timmy on Wed, 18 January 2012 15:23
|
Goto Forum:
[  ]
|