yusime
|
 |
Likes it here |
Location: United States
Registered: April 2008
Messages: 195
|
|
|
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-1371.ZC.html
Christian Legal Soc. v. Martinez
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-1371.ZS.html
http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/06/analysis-a-fatal-stipulation/
The decision basically states public organizations that have a nondiscrimination policy can require groups that wish recognition by the organization to comply with the policy so long as the policy is not expressly biased against the group seeking recognition and requires every group who wants recognition to be in accordance with the policy of the organization.
Or public organizations can set up rules according to the desire of the organization and groups that seek privileges must abide by the rules to receive those privileges.
If you only want the relevant links its 1 and 3. 2 is the outline of the case, and the last one is for those interested in Justice Stevens.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/05/john-paul-stevens-leader-of-the-resistance/
The United States says goodbye to a very principled and respectable man. I am glad that Stevens gave us Romer v. Evans and that his dissent in Bowers v. Hardwick became the ruling of the Supreme Court in Lawerence v. Texas.
He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake since for him a spinal cord would suffice. Albert Einstein
|
] 
A Place of Safety
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
