|
|
I am very undecided after reading this story, not sure what to think.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41476929/ns/world_news-europe
I do understand that this court decision is about protecting this man Alan who has a low IQ. I would hate to think this ban on his sex life is because he was sleeping with a man.
I read this as Alan has a roof over his head and a man in his bed. He may not be bright enough to hold a job but he is keen about survival. The court decision makes it sound like he is being taken advantge of, but then there seems to be no penalty for the gentleman in Alan's bed.
Sex is such a basic instinct, how much intelligence do you need to have? Imagine having a court order restricting you from having sex...no thank you!
Age appears to be best in four things; old wood best to burn, old wine to drink, old friends to trust, and old authors to read. (Sir Francis Bacon 1561-1626)
|