 |
|
Uganda Kill the Gays Bill
By: timmy on Thu, 03 December 2009 11:34
|
 |
|
Re: Uganda Kill the Gays Bill
By: timmy on Wed, 09 December 2009 23:36
|
 |
|
By no means over
By: timmy on Thu, 10 December 2009 10:33
|
 |
|
Re: By no means over
By: acam on Thu, 10 December 2009 12:59
|
 |
|
Re: By no means over
By: timmy on Thu, 10 December 2009 14:52
|
 |
|
Re: By no means over
By: saben on Thu, 10 December 2009 15:35
|
 |
|
Re: By no means over
By: timmy on Thu, 10 December 2009 15:49
|
 |
|
Re: By no means over
|
 |
|
Re: By no means over
By: timmy on Thu, 10 December 2009 16:51
|
 |
|
This is what people power achieved
By: timmy on Thu, 10 December 2009 16:59
|
 |
|
Another link ....
|
 |
|
Re: Another link ....
By: timmy on Fri, 11 December 2009 11:09
|
 |
|
Watch the video, Anthony
By: timmy on Sun, 20 December 2009 13:05
|
|
|
|
 |
|
I have no idea how to do this
By: timmy on Fri, 18 December 2009 23:46
|
 |
|
Who posts on other forums?
By: timmy on Sat, 19 December 2009 13:28
|
 |
|
Re: I have no idea how to do this
By: Macky on Sat, 19 December 2009 16:43
|
 |
|
Re: I have no idea how to do this
|
 |
|
Re: I have no idea how to do this
By: Macky on Sat, 19 December 2009 19:48
|
 |
|
Re: I have no idea how to do this
By: timmy on Sat, 19 December 2009 20:23
|
 |
|
Re: I have no idea how to do this
By: Macky on Sat, 19 December 2009 21:48
|
 |
|
Re: I have no idea how to do this
By: Macky on Sat, 19 December 2009 22:03
|
 |
|
Re: I have no idea how to do this
By: timmy on Sat, 19 December 2009 22:26
|
 |
|
Re: I have no idea how to do this
By: timmy on Sat, 19 December 2009 22:12
|
 |
|
Re: I have no idea how to do this
|
 |
|
Re: I have no idea how to do this
By: Macky on Sat, 19 December 2009 22:32
|
 |
|
This is about "ETHNIC" CLEANSING, not capital punishment.
By: timmy on Sat, 19 December 2009 22:40
|
 |
|
Re: I have no idea how to do this
By: timmy on Sat, 19 December 2009 17:53
|
 |
|
Re: I have no idea how to do this
By: timmy on Sat, 19 December 2009 17:59
|
|
 |
|
Is morality biological?
By: E.J. on Mon, 14 December 2009 01:09
|
 |
|
Re: Is morality biological?
By: timmy on Mon, 14 December 2009 08:02
|
 |
|
Re: Is morality biological?
By: JFR on Mon, 14 December 2009 09:24
|
 |
|
Re: Is morality biological?
By: acam on Mon, 14 December 2009 09:50
|
 |
|
Re: Is morality biological?
By: JFR on Mon, 14 December 2009 10:01
|
 |
|
Re: Is morality biological?
By: saben on Mon, 14 December 2009 15:03
|
 |
|
Re: Is morality biological?
By: acam on Mon, 14 December 2009 09:44
|
 |
|
Re: Is morality biological?
By: saben on Mon, 14 December 2009 15:07
|
 |
|
Re: Is morality biological?
By: acam on Mon, 14 December 2009 12:09
|
 |
|
Re: Is morality biological?
By: Macky on Mon, 14 December 2009 12:48
|
 |
|
Re: Is morality biological?
By: saben on Mon, 14 December 2009 15:09
|
 |
|
The cosmological constant.
By: arich on Mon, 14 December 2009 15:18
|
 |
|
Re: The cosmological constant.
By: JFR on Mon, 14 December 2009 17:15
|
 |
|
Re: The cosmological constant.
By: arich on Mon, 14 December 2009 18:35
|
 |
|
Re: The cosmological constant.
By: acam on Tue, 15 December 2009 09:41
|
 |
|
Re: The cosmological constant.
By: arich on Tue, 15 December 2009 14:32
|
 |
|
Re: The cosmological constant.
By: acam on Wed, 16 December 2009 09:38
|
 |
|
Re: The cosmological constant.
By: arich on Wed, 16 December 2009 15:47
|
 |
|
Re: The cosmological constant.
By: timmy on Wed, 16 December 2009 16:39
|
 |
|
Re: The cosmological constant.
By: arich on Wed, 16 December 2009 17:24
|
 |
 |
In keeping with the theme of this thread.... Here's this!
|
 |
|
Re: In keeping with the theme of this thread.... Here's this!
By: Macky on Wed, 16 December 2009 18:46
|
 |
|
Re: The cosmological constant.
By: timmy on Wed, 16 December 2009 17:51
|
 |
|
Re: The cosmological constant.
By: arich on Wed, 16 December 2009 18:34
|
 |
|
Re: The cosmological constant.
By: acam on Thu, 17 December 2009 12:03
|
 |
|
Re: The cosmological constant.
By: arich on Thu, 17 December 2009 14:22
|
 |
|
This is an example of a morality gulf
By: timmy on Mon, 14 December 2009 17:25
|
 |
|
An addendum to this
|
 |
|
Re: An addendum to this
By: acam on Fri, 18 December 2009 12:37
|
 |
|
Re: An addendum to this
|
 |
|
A rejoinder to relativism
By: acam on Fri, 18 December 2009 18:43
|
 |
 |
I reject this. It is time to campaign.
By: timmy on Fri, 18 December 2009 20:32
|
 |
|
Re: I reject this. It is time to campaign.
|
 |
|
Re: I reject this. It is time to campaign.
By: acam on Sat, 19 December 2009 10:10
|
 |
 |
Are we campaigning yet?
By: timmy on Sat, 19 December 2009 10:20
|
|
 |
 |
The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: arich on Thu, 17 December 2009 14:59
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: timmy on Thu, 17 December 2009 15:04
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: arich on Thu, 17 December 2009 15:07
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: timmy on Thu, 17 December 2009 17:23
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: arich on Thu, 17 December 2009 17:45
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: timmy on Thu, 17 December 2009 17:53
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: arich on Thu, 17 December 2009 18:31
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: timmy on Thu, 17 December 2009 22:14
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: Macky on Thu, 17 December 2009 20:42
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: arich on Fri, 18 December 2009 16:12
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: timmy on Fri, 18 December 2009 16:26
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: Macky on Fri, 18 December 2009 16:31
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: acam on Fri, 18 December 2009 18:13
|
 |
|
Re: The name of the game is put up or shut up!
By: acam on Thu, 17 December 2009 22:48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
JFR in intensive cardiac care
By: timmy on Wed, 09 December 2009 09:30
|
 |
|
Re: JFR in intensive cardiac care
|
 |
|
Re: JFR in intensive cardiac care
By: NW on Wed, 09 December 2009 11:08
|
 |
|
Re: JFR in intensive cardiac care
By: acam on Wed, 09 December 2009 11:20
|
 |
|
Re: JFR in intensive cardiac care
By: timmy on Wed, 09 December 2009 11:49
|
 |
|
Re: JFR in intensive cardiac care
By: Beholden on Wed, 09 December 2009 14:21
|
 |
|
Back home
By: timmy on Wed, 09 December 2009 15:34
|
 |
|
Re: JFR in intensive cardiac care
By: saben on Wed, 09 December 2009 16:10
|
 |
|
Re: JFR in intensive cardiac care
By: aqualino on Wed, 09 December 2009 17:52
|
 |
|
Re: JFR in intensive cardiac care
By: Nigel on Wed, 09 December 2009 23:58
|
 |
|
The patient is sitting up and taking notice
By: timmy on Thu, 10 December 2009 07:43
|
 |
|
Re: The patient is sitting up and taking notice
|
 |
|
Re: JFR in intensive cardiac care
By: Deeej on Thu, 10 December 2009 18:09
|
 |
|
The Bad Penny Returns
By: JFR on Mon, 14 December 2009 07:48
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The puritanisation of the internet
By: saben on Wed, 02 December 2009 17:08
|
 |
|
Re: The puritanisation of the internet
By: timmy on Wed, 02 December 2009 17:25
|
 |
|
Re: The puritanisation of the internet
By: saben on Wed, 02 December 2009 17:42
|
 |
|
Re: The puritanisation of the internet
By: timmy on Wed, 02 December 2009 18:07
|
 |
|
Re: The puritanisation of the internet
By: saben on Wed, 02 December 2009 19:31
|
 |
|
Re: The puritanisation of the internet
By: timmy on Wed, 02 December 2009 20:32
|
 |
|
Re: The puritanisation of the internet
By: acam on Wed, 02 December 2009 23:54
|
 |
|
Re: The puritanisation of the internet
By: NW on Thu, 03 December 2009 10:14
|
 |
|
Re: The puritanisation of the internet
By: Macky on Thu, 03 December 2009 14:15
|
 |
|
"Only miscreants worry about net privacy" - Google CEO
By: timmy on Thu, 10 December 2009 15:00
|
 |
|
Re: The puritanisation of the internet
By: Deeej on Thu, 10 December 2009 19:02
|
|
 |
|
The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: yusime on Fri, 04 December 2009 07:02
|
 |
|
Re: The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: timmy on Fri, 04 December 2009 07:16
|
 |
|
Re: The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: saben on Fri, 04 December 2009 11:57
|
 |
|
Re: The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: Scott on Sat, 05 December 2009 12:27
|
 |
|
Re: The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: saben on Wed, 09 December 2009 16:00
|
 |
|
Re: The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: acam on Sat, 05 December 2009 14:24
|
 |
|
Re: The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: saben on Wed, 09 December 2009 16:07
|
 |
|
Re: The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: yusime on Thu, 10 December 2009 05:36
|
 |
|
Re: The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: saben on Thu, 10 December 2009 07:46
|
 |
|
Re: The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: yusime on Thu, 10 December 2009 16:30
|
 |
|
Re: The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: yusime on Sat, 05 December 2009 18:17
|
 |
|
Re: The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: saben on Wed, 09 December 2009 15:57
|
 |
|
Re: The Radical Right has hit a brand new low.
By: saben on Wed, 09 December 2009 16:09
|
|
|
 |
|
WHAT"S IN IT FOR US?
By: Macky on Tue, 08 December 2009 00:20
|
 |
|
Re: WHAT"S IN IT FOR US?
|
 |
|
Re: WHAT"S IN IT FOR US?
By: Macky on Tue, 08 December 2009 00:56
|
 |
|
Re: WHAT"S IN IT FOR US?
By: Aussie on Tue, 08 December 2009 01:27
|
 |
|
Re: WHAT"S IN IT FOR US?
|
 |
|
Re: WHAT"S IN IT FOR US?
By: Aussie on Tue, 08 December 2009 03:35
|
 |
|
Re: WHAT"S IN IT FOR US?
|
 |
|
Re: WHAT"S IN IT FOR US?
By: Aussie on Tue, 08 December 2009 03:58
|
 |
|
The question is reasonable
By: timmy on Tue, 08 December 2009 07:46
|
 |
|
Because helping helps me
By: timmy on Tue, 08 December 2009 07:42
|
 |
|
What's in it for me
By: acam on Tue, 08 December 2009 10:13
|
 |
|
Re: What's in it for me
By: Nigel on Tue, 08 December 2009 21:55
|
 |
|
Re: Because helping helps me
By: Macky on Tue, 08 December 2009 20:34
|
 |
|
> Wow. You mean, like, since you were focusing on the other guy's problem, you didn't dwell on your own problem so much?
Not really, no. It's far more complex than that. In ma..." style="padding-left: 60px">
Re: Because helping helps me
By: timmy on Tue, 08 December 2009 20:43
|
 |
|
Re: WHAT"S IN IT FOR US?
By: NW on Tue, 08 December 2009 10:17
|
 |
|
But...
By: timmy on Tue, 08 December 2009 10:41
|
 |
|
Re: But...
By: NW on Tue, 08 December 2009 10:50
|
 |
|
Re: But...
By: timmy on Tue, 08 December 2009 12:52
|
 |
|
Re: WHAT"S IN IT FOR US?
By: Macky on Tue, 08 December 2009 21:21
|
 |
|
Re: WHAT"S IN IT FOR US?
By: NW on Tue, 08 December 2009 22:22
|
 |
|
"What's in it for me Macky?" Because you have asked ...
|
 |
|
Re: "What's in it for me Macky?" Because you have asked ...
By: Macky on Tue, 08 December 2009 21:32
|
|
 |
|
A friend sent me this....Um, ah, well, take a look.......
|
 |
|
This is surfacing today, in one incarnation or another ...
|
 |
|
Re: A friend sent me this....Um, ah, well, take a look......
By: timmy on Tue, 08 December 2009 20:46
|
 |
|
Re: A friend sent me this....Um, ah, well, take a look......
By: Benji on Tue, 08 December 2009 22:18
|
|
|
 |
|
I am watching Anglican Christianity with disgust
By: timmy on Sun, 06 December 2009 17:32
|
 |
|
Re: I am watching Anglican Christianity with disgust
By: Macky on Sun, 06 December 2009 18:17
|
 |
|
Re: I am watching Anglican Christianity with disgust
By: Nigel on Sun, 06 December 2009 22:11
|
 |
|
Re: I am watching Anglican Christianity with disgust
By: timmy on Sun, 06 December 2009 22:32
|
 |
|
Re: I am watching Anglican Christianity with disgust
By: Nigel on Mon, 07 December 2009 09:01
|
 |
|
Re: I am watching Anglican Christianity with disgust
By: timmy on Mon, 07 December 2009 09:06
|
 |
|
Anglican Christianity is the same as usual
By: acam on Mon, 07 December 2009 10:05
|
 |
|
Re: I am watching Anglican Christianity with disgust
By: E.J. on Mon, 07 December 2009 17:12
|
 |
|
Re: I am watching Anglican Christianity with disgust
By: timmy on Mon, 07 December 2009 17:23
|
 |
|
Re: I am watching Anglican Christianity with disgust
By: timmy on Mon, 07 December 2009 19:00
|
 |
|
Re: I am watching Anglican Christianity with disgust
By: acam on Tue, 08 December 2009 13:11
|
 |
|
Re: I am watching Anglican Christianity with disgust
By: timmy on Tue, 08 December 2009 13:55
|
|
 |
|
tears streaming down my face ...
By: NW on Fri, 04 December 2009 00:14
|
 |
|
Re: tears streaming down my face ...
By: Benji on Fri, 04 December 2009 04:57
|
 |
|
Re: tears streaming down my face ...
By: timmy on Fri, 04 December 2009 07:14
|
 |
|
Re: tears streaming down my face ...
By: NW on Fri, 04 December 2009 07:38
|
 |
|
Re: tears streaming down my face ...
By: timmy on Fri, 04 December 2009 07:56
|
 |
|
"constancy"
By: NW on Fri, 04 December 2009 09:53
|
 |
|
Re: "constancy"
By: timmy on Fri, 04 December 2009 11:36
|
 |
|
Re: tears streaming down my face ...
By: NW on Fri, 04 December 2009 13:43
|
 |
|
Well, today was ... interesting.
By: NW on Fri, 04 December 2009 20:29
|
 |
|
Re: Well, today was ... interesting.
By: timmy on Fri, 04 December 2009 21:10
|
 |
|
Re: Well, today was ... interesting.
By: NW on Fri, 04 December 2009 21:40
|
 |
|
Re: Well, today was ... interesting.
By: timmy on Fri, 04 December 2009 22:05
|
 |
|
Being non-threatening and not giving an inch ...
|
 |
|
Re: Being non-threatening and not giving an inch ...
By: NW on Sun, 06 December 2009 19:44
|
 |
|
Re: Being non-threatening and not giving an inch ...
By: timmy on Sun, 06 December 2009 20:01
|
 |
|
Re: Well, today was ... interesting.
By: acam on Fri, 04 December 2009 22:05
|
 |
|
Re: Well, today was ... interesting.
By: NW on Fri, 04 December 2009 22:34
|
 |
|
Re: Well, today was ... interesting.
By: Macky on Fri, 04 December 2009 23:14
|
 |
|
Re: Well, today was ... interesting.
By: NW on Fri, 04 December 2009 23:27
|
 |
|
Vulnerability
By: acam on Sat, 05 December 2009 09:44
|
 |
|
Re: Well, today was ... interesting.
By: timmy on Sat, 05 December 2009 22:09
|
 |
|
Re: Well, today was ... interesting.
By: Macky on Sat, 05 December 2009 23:09
|
 |
|
Re: Well, today was ... interesting.
By: timmy on Sun, 06 December 2009 08:22
|
|
 |
 |
HAPPY BIRTDAY, ACAM !
By: JFR on Fri, 04 December 2009 10:36
|
 |
|
Re: HAPPY BIRTDAY, ACAM !
By: acam on Fri, 04 December 2009 10:41
|
 |
|
Re: HAPPY BIRTDAY, ACAM !
By: NW on Fri, 04 December 2009 10:41
|
 |
|
Re: HAPPY BIRTDAY, ACAM !
By: timmy on Fri, 04 December 2009 11:37
|
 |
|
Re: HAPPY BIRTDAY, ACAM !
|
 |
|
Re: HAPPY BIRTDAY, ACAM !
By: Macky on Fri, 04 December 2009 23:37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Caution! The following is an editorial, it may piss you off
|
 |
|
one concern, one issue.
By: timmy on Tue, 01 December 2009 15:26
|
 |
|
Re: Caution! The following is an editorial, it may piss you off
By: NW on Tue, 01 December 2009 16:03
|
 |
|
move towards a middle view
By: timmy on Tue, 01 December 2009 17:26
|
 |
|
Re: Caution! The following is an editorial, it may piss you off
By: JimB on Tue, 01 December 2009 16:33
|
 |
|
Re: Caution! The following is an editorial, it may piss you off
By: saben on Tue, 01 December 2009 19:28
|
 |
|
Re: Caution! The following is an editorial, it may piss you off
By: NW on Tue, 01 December 2009 19:38
|
 |
|
balance again
By: timmy on Tue, 01 December 2009 19:43
|
 |
|
balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scales!
By: NW on Tue, 01 December 2009 19:59
|
 |
|
Re: balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scales!
|
 |
|
the heat
By: timmy on Tue, 01 December 2009 21:22
|
 |
|
Re: balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scales!
By: NW on Tue, 01 December 2009 21:42
|
 |
|
Re: balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scal
By: timmy on Tue, 01 December 2009 22:19
|
 |
|
Re: balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scal
By: NW on Tue, 01 December 2009 22:33
|
 |
|
Re: balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scal
By: timmy on Tue, 01 December 2009 23:01
|
 |
|
Re: balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scal
By: NW on Tue, 01 December 2009 23:07
|
 |
|
Re: balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scal
By: Macky on Tue, 01 December 2009 23:28
|
 |
|
Re: balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scal
|
 |
|
Re: balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scal
By: Macky on Tue, 01 December 2009 23:53
|
 |
|
i have a question...well more of a request :)
By: M on Wed, 02 December 2009 00:12
|
 |
|
Re: balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scal
By: NW on Wed, 02 December 2009 00:20
|
 |
|
Re: balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scal
By: timmy on Wed, 02 December 2009 00:46
|
 |
|
Re: balance - but please don't sand-bag one side of the scal
|
 |
|
OK, this is the more "sensible" reply ...
By: NW on Wed, 02 December 2009 10:54
|
 |
|
Re: OK, this is the more "sensible" reply ...
By: timmy on Wed, 02 December 2009 11:05
|
 |
|
Re: OK, this is the more "sensible" reply ...
By: NW on Wed, 02 December 2009 11:19
|
|
<more> |
 |
|
Personal versus impersonal
By: acam on Wed, 02 December 2009 10:10
|
 |
|
Back to the left margin, and summary
By: timmy on Wed, 02 December 2009 10:54
|
 |
|
Re: Back to the left margin, and summary
By: JFR on Wed, 02 December 2009 12:36
|
 |
|
The discussion rolls forward.... And shifting to impersonal
|
 |
|
Re: The discussion rolls forward.... And shifting to impersonal
By: NW on Wed, 02 December 2009 14:14
|
 |
|
Re: The discussion rolls forward.... And shifting to impersonal
|
 |
|
Re: The discussion rolls forward.... And shifting to impersonal
By: NW on Wed, 02 December 2009 15:03
|
 |
|
Re: The discussion rolls forward.... And shifting to imperso
By: Nigel on Wed, 02 December 2009 22:42
|
 |
|
Re: The discussion rolls forward.... And shifting to imperso
By: timmy on Wed, 02 December 2009 22:48
|
 |
|
Re: The discussion rolls forward.... And shifting to imperso
By: Nigel on Wed, 02 December 2009 23:01
|
 |
|
Re: The discussion rolls forward.... And shifting to imperso
By: Macky on Thu, 03 December 2009 02:20
|
 |
|
Re: The discussion rolls forward.... And shifting to imperso
By: Nigel on Thu, 03 December 2009 08:48
|
 |
|
Re: Back to the left margin, and summary
By: timmy on Wed, 02 December 2009 17:17
|
 |
|
Re: Back to the left margin, and summary
By: NW on Wed, 02 December 2009 17:43
|
 |
|
Re: Back to the left margin, and summary
By: timmy on Wed, 02 December 2009 17:57
|
 |
|
My notes:
By: saben on Wed, 02 December 2009 15:38
|
 |
|
Re: My notes:
By: saben on Wed, 02 December 2009 15:43
|
 |
|
Re: My notes:
By: NW on Wed, 02 December 2009 15:46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|